DeadPoolX wrote:
You're judging TellTale's attempt (which we haven't even seen yet, so it seems premature to discount it) based on previous games. That's as bad as judging Sierra based on their very early titles. Besides, not all reboots are bad. Given TellTale's solid Adventure game history, I'd give them the benefit of the doubt.
Well, what else would you judge a new game on, if not the companies previous games? Would you Codemasters, the makers of LSL:BOB, said they were going to make another LSL game... Or, having heard of the utter failure that was BOB, would you scoff at the idea of them doing another LSL game? After all, are you not also judging Codemasters by their previous games? If someone isn't happy with how a company makes a game, it's as simple as that really.
DeadPoolX wrote:
KQ8, MCL and BOB weren't made by people who understand Adventure games. That's the key difference. Before someone says anything about Roberta Williams on KQ8, we all know she had very little control over it. That wasn't her creation anymore, so it became the child of those who didn't understand or care about Adventures. The same is true of MCL and BOB.
You know, the whole Roberta didn't have much of a hand or control over KQ8... I don't know if I will ever QUITE believe that... or see that as an excuse, considering how poorly it flopped. I am pretty sure I read, directly from her in some interview, that the gaming world had changed, and KQ8 was an attempt to follow that changing world within games. So it seems like she knew what she was doing. It flopped and suddenly her hands are off it and she didn't have any control over it.
DeadPoolX wrote:
TellTale understands Adventures. That in of itself puts anything they do with the KQ series miles ahead of KQ8, MCL and BOB.
Entirely possible. And I am not discounting that. But I am merely going off their latest few games that I have seen (and admittedly, not played) - but I have not played because they're episodic (or whatever you want to call it). I never even got the 2nd TSL, which I heard just came out, because I can't be bothered to remember it.
But that said, looking at their Back to the Future, I think they'd make a great Willy Beamish remake; because the animation seemed like a natural upgrade to Willy Beamish type of game. King's Quest, I am not so certain. Yet.
DeadPoolX wrote:
As for BioWare.. they're not an Adventure company. They make RPGs, which while related to Adventures, aren't the same thing. The only Sierra title BioWare would really be qualified to do would be a remake of the QFG series.
My point here was, a trusted gaming company telling me they're going to remake a classic game. I'd even be leery of them doing a remake of QFG, as your better example cites.